header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 17 August 2007

GMB v ALLEN
ANTIPATHY BETWEEN TRADE UNIONS AND dissident members
AUTONOMY VERSUS PATERNALISM
ROUGH INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

While most of the noises of wind that readers will have been hearing recently are the sounds of the incessant rain clouds in this miserable non summer, some may well have been the collective sighs of relief of trade unionists all over the country at the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in GMB v Allen [2007] UKEAT/425/06 (handed down on 31 July) allowing the union’s appeal against a tribunal decision that it had been guilty of sex discrimination and victimisation in not pursuing in full the claims of some female members to equal pay, in particular in relation to back pay.

EQUAL PAY CASE MANAGEMENT

The case is one of the latest stages in the equal pay trench warfare currently raging in the context of local authority pay in northern England. So worrying is this litigation in general—in terms of legal costs and tribunal/ACAS resources—that it even featured in the recent Gibbons Report on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll