header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 February 2024 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 9 February 2024

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
157360
Attention, TUPE geeks! Ian Smith talks us through a transfer case with a difference, as well as the latest employment developments
  • The common law defence of novus actus interveniens.
  • Three computational issues in unfair dismissal compensation.
  • TUPE: effect of the transfer of perpetrator, not the claimant.

The current flurry of employment-related legislation continued last month, with (i) changes to immigration law to introduce a new code of practice for employers and an increase in the administrative penalty for getting it wrong from £20,000 to £60,000, as from 13 February; (ii) the removal of the ‘family-related workers’ national minimum wage exception, as from 1 April; (iii) new rules on the composition of employment tribunals (ETs) and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), full commencement dependent on the senior president of tribunals; and (iv) a revised Acas code of practice on flexible working, to be brought into force by order.

Also continuing is the governmental bad habit of late production of these changes. For example, the ET/EAT changes were published

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll