header-logo header-logo

07 February 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7827 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 7 February 2019

Ian Smith serves up a turbo-charged, non-biased update on recent case law & substantive procedural matters

  • ASDA Stores (1): the comparison point. ASDA Stores (2): the procedural point.
  • Extension of time for appealing to the EAT: computer problems and ill health.
  • Apparent bias at ET hearing.
  • Much of the case development in recent employment law has concerned mainstream substantive matters such as employment/worker status and contractual and statutory rights on dismissal. However, for a change the four cases (three Court of Appeal and one Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)) considered this month show that other substantive areas and procedural matters must not be overlooked, even if they may seem at times to have gone to sleep. The first two concern the same litigation—namely the ‘ASDA cases’ on equal pay—the third is a Court of Appeal case on extension of time for appealing to the EAT, and the fourth is an EAT case on when robust exchanges between Bench and Bar do and (more importantly) do not constitute apparent

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

    DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

    DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

    Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

    Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

    Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

    Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

    Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

    Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

    NEWS
    Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
    Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
    Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
    A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
    Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
    back-to-top-scroll