header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 14 February 2025

208119
No laughing matter: in this month’s brief, Ian Smith sets out guidance on damages awarded for hurt feelings & considers the scope of the Blacklisting Regulations
  • The impact of contributory action by the employee on the question of re-employment.
  • Guidance on making awards for injury to feelings.
  • Blacklists: do the activities of a trade union include industrial action?

The last month saw the coming into force of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (SI 2024/1155) on 6 January and the commencement of the Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Act 2023 on 17 January. One difference between them is that the new rules are complete in themselves (with no transitional provisions), whereas the Act is almost entirely of a regulation-making nature, with the actual schemes to be set out in secondary legislation. The word is that the government intends this to be done by April, so watch this space.

It’s a funny old thing, legislative intent. The government are getting heavily into the idea of deregulation,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll