header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 14 February 2025

208119
No laughing matter: in this month’s brief, Ian Smith sets out guidance on damages awarded for hurt feelings & considers the scope of the Blacklisting Regulations
  • The impact of contributory action by the employee on the question of re-employment.
  • Guidance on making awards for injury to feelings.
  • Blacklists: do the activities of a trade union include industrial action?

The last month saw the coming into force of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (SI 2024/1155) on 6 January and the commencement of the Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Act 2023 on 17 January. One difference between them is that the new rules are complete in themselves (with no transitional provisions), whereas the Act is almost entirely of a regulation-making nature, with the actual schemes to be set out in secondary legislation. The word is that the government intends this to be done by April, so watch this space.

It’s a funny old thing, legislative intent. The government are getting heavily into the idea of deregulation,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll