header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 14 February 2025

208119
No laughing matter: in this month’s brief, Ian Smith sets out guidance on damages awarded for hurt feelings & considers the scope of the Blacklisting Regulations
  • The impact of contributory action by the employee on the question of re-employment.
  • Guidance on making awards for injury to feelings.
  • Blacklists: do the activities of a trade union include industrial action?

The last month saw the coming into force of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (SI 2024/1155) on 6 January and the commencement of the Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Act 2023 on 17 January. One difference between them is that the new rules are complete in themselves (with no transitional provisions), whereas the Act is almost entirely of a regulation-making nature, with the actual schemes to be set out in secondary legislation. The word is that the government intends this to be done by April, so watch this space.

It’s a funny old thing, legislative intent. The government are getting heavily into the idea of deregulation,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll