header-logo header-logo

18 June 2014 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 18 June 2014

employment_smith_0

Ian Smith considers the latest employment law developments

Three cases in the last month have addressed issues of current concern in employment law, namely nil-hours contracts, the employment status of partners and how to calculate holiday pay when the employee is remunerated other than simply by basic rates. These all contain important explorations of fundamental principles but the other thing that links them is that there must be the strong feeling in relation to each that considerably more will need to be decided about them in future litigation.

Nil-hours contracts: the problems start to crystallise

The question of the status of those on “nil-hours contracts” has recently taken on some political controversy. The decision of Judge Shanks in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Saha v Viewpoint Field Services Ltd UKEAT/0116/13 shows how difficult a question this can be and how reliant it is on factual findings. Interestingly, the judgment ends with a statement by the judge that this is an area in need of legislative reform.

The claimant was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll