header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 10 July 2026

254472
© Getty images
Ian Smith tackles employers moving the goalposts & reflects on the dangers of fielding an unreliable defence
  • Four recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have clarified key employment law principles, including summary dismissal, bonus entitlement, trade union dismissals and tribunal procedure.
  • The cases reinforce a fact-specific approach to employment disputes, while confirming limits on employer discretion and emphasising procedural fairness.

Even though the summer is upon us and the most important decision for employment lawyers is which of the now-seven volumes of the hard copy of Harvey to pack in their suitcase for light reading round the pool in Tuscany, these dog days have still seen four notable decisions of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on some rather fundamental points of law. Not only that, but the first two concern essentially matters of common law as applied to employment law, namely whether an employee’s motives can be relevant when deciding on the legality of a summary dismissal, and when a bonus crystallises, so that the employer cannot then

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll