header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 10 July 2026

254472
© Getty images
Ian Smith tackles employers moving the goalposts & reflects on the dangers of fielding an unreliable defence
  • Four recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have clarified key employment law principles, including summary dismissal, bonus entitlement, trade union dismissals and tribunal procedure.
  • The cases reinforce a fact-specific approach to employment disputes, while confirming limits on employer discretion and emphasising procedural fairness.

Even though the summer is upon us and the most important decision for employment lawyers is which of the now-seven volumes of the hard copy of Harvey to pack in their suitcase for light reading round the pool in Tuscany, these dog days have still seen four notable decisions of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on some rather fundamental points of law. Not only that, but the first two concern essentially matters of common law as applied to employment law, namely whether an employee’s motives can be relevant when deciding on the legality of a summary dismissal, and when a bonus crystallises, so that the employer cannot then

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll