header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 10 July 2026

254472
© Getty images
Ian Smith tackles employers moving the goalposts & reflects on the dangers of fielding an unreliable defence
  • Four recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have clarified key employment law principles, including summary dismissal, bonus entitlement, trade union dismissals and tribunal procedure.
  • The cases reinforce a fact-specific approach to employment disputes, while confirming limits on employer discretion and emphasising procedural fairness.

Even though the summer is upon us and the most important decision for employment lawyers is which of the now-seven volumes of the hard copy of Harvey to pack in their suitcase for light reading round the pool in Tuscany, these dog days have still seen four notable decisions of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on some rather fundamental points of law. Not only that, but the first two concern essentially matters of common law as applied to employment law, namely whether an employee’s motives can be relevant when deciding on the legality of a summary dismissal, and when a bonus crystallises, so that the employer cannot then

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS

Family set expands with the formal integration of 4 Brick Court into 42BR Barristers

The Court of Appeal has issued a stern warning to lawyers engaging in the practice of ‘privilege hunting’—obtaining an opponent’s legally privileged information through dishonest means
Legal executives have given a lukewarm reception to the Legal Services Board’s (LSB’s) final report from its regulatory review into Mazur advice and guidance
A homeless single parent offered accommodation in Derby has lost her Supreme Court appeal against the London council making the offer
The Kingdom of Bahrain does not enjoy sovereign immunity from allegations it used surveillance software to spy on dissidents in the UK, the Supreme Court has held
back-to-top-scroll