header-logo header-logo

15 October 2015 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 15 October 2015

nlj_7672_smith

Ian Smith provides a round-up from the coalface

Four cases have been chosen for this column in order to keep us all amused and free from suicidal thoughts as the darker autumn days are upon us. They all concern mainstream areas of employment law and have a certain theme, namely as being to some degree shots across the bow to both sides of the employment contract. The first case is a warning to agency workers that their legal protection, while important, does have limits, especially where in conflict with the greater rights of permanent staff. The second case suggests a possible complication for employers in relation to an employee’s right to accompaniment at a disciplinary hearing; those advising employers will have to hope that it is actually a one-off on odd facts (especially as it was a common law claim, not heard by the specialist Employment Appeal Tribunal which just might have come to a different conclusion). The third case is yet another example of a hard line being taken on the dismissal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll