header-logo header-logo

10 February 2021 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 February 2021

38897
Internal procedures, constructive dismissals & the slippery slope of indirect discrimination: Ian Smith offers some expert tuition
  • Using internal procedures does not rule out a later constructive dismissal claim.
  • Court of Appeal rules on how to deal with a request to extend time in a discrimination case.
  • Two helpful examples of indirect sex discrimination cases.

The first case considered in this brief is an important one in practice for employees faced with really bad treatment by the employer, potentially unacceptable, but wanting to at least try to resolve matters internally before walking out and losing their job: if they use the employer’s grievance or appeal procedure, do they thereby jeopardise their right to claim constructive dismissal? The second case, on how to adjudicate on an application to extend the time limit for a discrimination claim, shares one aspect with the first case, namely that the answer has been uncertain for some time, given the importance of the questions. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has (hopefully) resolved the first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll