header-logo header-logo

10 February 2021 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 February 2021

38897
Internal procedures, constructive dismissals & the slippery slope of indirect discrimination: Ian Smith offers some expert tuition
  • Using internal procedures does not rule out a later constructive dismissal claim.
  • Court of Appeal rules on how to deal with a request to extend time in a discrimination case.
  • Two helpful examples of indirect sex discrimination cases.

The first case considered in this brief is an important one in practice for employees faced with really bad treatment by the employer, potentially unacceptable, but wanting to at least try to resolve matters internally before walking out and losing their job: if they use the employer’s grievance or appeal procedure, do they thereby jeopardise their right to claim constructive dismissal? The second case, on how to adjudicate on an application to extend the time limit for a discrimination claim, shares one aspect with the first case, namely that the answer has been uncertain for some time, given the importance of the questions. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has (hopefully) resolved the first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll