header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 13 August 2021

13 August 2021 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7945 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
54932
Ian Smith signs off from his beach hut with an eclectic mix of cases involving suspicion, doubt, disbelief & enforcement
  • Establishing the reason for dismissal in an organisation.
  • Dismissal on suspicion, short of positive belief.
  • Reasonable adjustments; no general requirement to maintain higher level of pay.
  • Enforcement; burden of proof; effect of Equality Act 2010; submission of no case to answer.

The four cases considered this month are an eclectic lot. The only connection between them is that they all concern issues (depressingly?) well known to employment lawyers. The first contains a warning not to overuse a relatively recent Supreme Court decision on how to establish ‘the reason’ for a dismissal in the case of an organisation. The second explores yet again one of the most contentious areas in unfair dismissal law, namely when an employee can be fairly dismissed on suspicion, short of a genuine belief in guilt. It shows how parlous the position can be of an employee caught up in these circumstances, especially when the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll