header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 13 August 2021

13 August 2021 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7945 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
54932
Ian Smith signs off from his beach hut with an eclectic mix of cases involving suspicion, doubt, disbelief & enforcement
  • Establishing the reason for dismissal in an organisation.
  • Dismissal on suspicion, short of positive belief.
  • Reasonable adjustments; no general requirement to maintain higher level of pay.
  • Enforcement; burden of proof; effect of Equality Act 2010; submission of no case to answer.

The four cases considered this month are an eclectic lot. The only connection between them is that they all concern issues (depressingly?) well known to employment lawyers. The first contains a warning not to overuse a relatively recent Supreme Court decision on how to establish ‘the reason’ for a dismissal in the case of an organisation. The second explores yet again one of the most contentious areas in unfair dismissal law, namely when an employee can be fairly dismissed on suspicion, short of a genuine belief in guilt. It shows how parlous the position can be of an employee caught up in these circumstances, especially when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll