header-logo header-logo

12 April 2017 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 April 2017

nlj_7742_smith

Ian Smith considers recent key employment decisions

  • When is notice given at common law?
  • No contractual interpretation in a deduction from wages case.
  • Dealing with long term sickness.
  • Offers of suitable alternative employment & unfair dismissal.

Four apparently simple questions arise from the cases considered this month: (i) when is notice of dismissal actually given at common law?; (ii) how far can a tribunal look into the contractual rights and wrongs when deciding an action for unlawful deductions from wages?; (iii) how long does an employer have to wait before dismissing an employee for long-term sickness absence?; and (iv) how do the laws on suitable alternative employment and unfair dismissal fit together? The one thing they have in common is that, although the questions are simple, the answers are not necessarily so.

When is notice given at common law?

Precise dates were of extreme importance in the common law claim in Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood [2017] EWCA Civ 153; [2017] All ER (D)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll