header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 12 April 2017

12 April 2017 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7742_smith

Ian Smith considers recent key employment decisions

  • When is notice given at common law?
  • No contractual interpretation in a deduction from wages case.
  • Dealing with long term sickness.
  • Offers of suitable alternative employment & unfair dismissal.

Four apparently simple questions arise from the cases considered this month: (i) when is notice of dismissal actually given at common law?; (ii) how far can a tribunal look into the contractual rights and wrongs when deciding an action for unlawful deductions from wages?; (iii) how long does an employer have to wait before dismissing an employee for long-term sickness absence?; and (iv) how do the laws on suitable alternative employment and unfair dismissal fit together? The one thing they have in common is that, although the questions are simple, the answers are not necessarily so.

When is notice given at common law?

Precise dates were of extreme importance in the common law claim in Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood [2017] EWCA Civ 153; [2017] All ER (D)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll