header-logo header-logo

12 April 2017 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 April 2017

nlj_7742_smith

Ian Smith considers recent key employment decisions

  • When is notice given at common law?
  • No contractual interpretation in a deduction from wages case.
  • Dealing with long term sickness.
  • Offers of suitable alternative employment & unfair dismissal.

Four apparently simple questions arise from the cases considered this month: (i) when is notice of dismissal actually given at common law?; (ii) how far can a tribunal look into the contractual rights and wrongs when deciding an action for unlawful deductions from wages?; (iii) how long does an employer have to wait before dismissing an employee for long-term sickness absence?; and (iv) how do the laws on suitable alternative employment and unfair dismissal fit together? The one thing they have in common is that, although the questions are simple, the answers are not necessarily so.

When is notice given at common law?

Precise dates were of extreme importance in the common law claim in Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood [2017] EWCA Civ 153; [2017] All ER (D)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll