header-logo header-logo

11 May 2017 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7745 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 11 May 2017

nlj_7745_smith

Ian Smith navigates the crazy world of employment law

  • Revisiting claims for unlawful deductions from wages.
  • Ambiguous immigration status & unfair dismissal law.
  • National minimum wage entitlement of an on-call care worker—the latest episode.

What a crazy world we employment lawyers inhabit. You really cannot turn your back for a moment, even to make a cup of tea, without something new happening. It is why so many of us have a nervous tic while logging on to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) website. The first case considered in this Brief illustrates this fundamental truth.

There was reported in last month’s ‘Employment law brief’ the decision of Slade J in Agarwal v Cardiff University UKEAT/0210/16 (22 March, unreported) to the effect that in an action for unlawful deductions from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), s 13, a tribunal in deciding whether or not the disputed amount had been ‘properly payable’ may not interpret the contract of employment or decide whether a term is to be implied

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll