header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 11 May 2017

11 May 2017 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7745 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7745_smith

Ian Smith navigates the crazy world of employment law

  • Revisiting claims for unlawful deductions from wages.
  • Ambiguous immigration status & unfair dismissal law.
  • National minimum wage entitlement of an on-call care worker—the latest episode.

What a crazy world we employment lawyers inhabit. You really cannot turn your back for a moment, even to make a cup of tea, without something new happening. It is why so many of us have a nervous tic while logging on to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) website. The first case considered in this Brief illustrates this fundamental truth.

There was reported in last month’s ‘Employment law brief’ the decision of Slade J in Agarwal v Cardiff University UKEAT/0210/16 (22 March, unreported) to the effect that in an action for unlawful deductions from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), s 13, a tribunal in deciding whether or not the disputed amount had been ‘properly payable’ may not interpret the contract of employment or decide whether a term is to be implied

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
back-to-top-scroll