header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 January 2007

Ian Smith explains why 2006 went out with a bang

If only to make Christmas and New Year a time of even greater gloom and unremitting misery for the average Harvey-editor-in-the-street, 2006 insisted on going out with something of a bang. An element of judicial desk clearing led to a flurry of case law on important topics, right up to the close of play before the break. The timing of this was only topped by those awfully nice people at HM Revenue & Customs who managed once again to include in the very last post their Merry Christmas missive with its customary demand for money with menaces.

In among this recent case law, three cases stand out and are considered here. The first is a decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) under Mr Justice Elias (President) giving guidance to tribunals on the thorny question of when a long-serving agency worker transmutes into a direct
employee of the client; the gist of this guidance is to be much more cautious than previous

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll