header-logo header-logo

08 September 2017 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7760 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 8 September 2017

nlj_7760_smith_carousel

Ian Smith shares his reflections on a frenetic summer of activity & intrigue

  • Apportionment in stress cases.
  • Voluntary overtime & statutory holiday pay.
  • Weekly pension contributions.

Given that last month was the fag end of the legal year, with everyone desperate for their foreign holidays in spite of an airport exchange rate of £15 to the euro, it provided some particularly eye catching case law. At the macro level we had a huge decision (in importance and physical length—464 paragraphs and two appendices) in the Court of Appeal on changes to the IBM pension scheme ( IBM Holdings Ltd v Dalgliesh [2017] EWCA Civ 1212, [2017] All ER (D) 46 (Aug)) and an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision on equal pay claims by 7,000 ASDA employees which is winging its way straight to the Court of Appeal ( ASDA Stores Ltd v Brierley UKEAT/0011/17).

However, the three cases discussed below concerned equally important points in micro level employment law, holding that: (1) in a stress case (either in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll