header-logo header-logo

08 September 2017 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7760 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 8 September 2017

nlj_7760_smith_carousel

Ian Smith shares his reflections on a frenetic summer of activity & intrigue

  • Apportionment in stress cases.
  • Voluntary overtime & statutory holiday pay.
  • Weekly pension contributions.

Given that last month was the fag end of the legal year, with everyone desperate for their foreign holidays in spite of an airport exchange rate of £15 to the euro, it provided some particularly eye catching case law. At the macro level we had a huge decision (in importance and physical length—464 paragraphs and two appendices) in the Court of Appeal on changes to the IBM pension scheme ( IBM Holdings Ltd v Dalgliesh [2017] EWCA Civ 1212, [2017] All ER (D) 46 (Aug)) and an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision on equal pay claims by 7,000 ASDA employees which is winging its way straight to the Court of Appeal ( ASDA Stores Ltd v Brierley UKEAT/0011/17).

However, the three cases discussed below concerned equally important points in micro level employment law, holding that: (1) in a stress case (either in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll