header-logo header-logo

08 April 2022 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 8 April 2022

77721
Making history: Ian Smith performs a perfect loop-the-loop & serves up three significant Court of Appeal decisions

In brief

  • ‘Worker’ definition—no need for an irreducible minimum of obligation.
  • Detriment on union grounds does not extend to taking industrial action.
  • Directors/CEOs and employment status—the EU law angle.

Apart from the usual spate of annual changes in the run-up to the beginning of April (the increase of the various employment protection limits, the up-rating of the national minimum wage and relevant social security benefit, a review of the Vento scales for injury to feelings awards by the employment tribunal (ET) presidents and, this year, two replacement immigration law codes of practice for employers on the operation of the civil penalty scheme for employing illegal workers and how to avoid unlawful discrimination when using the system) this has been a relatively quiet month for employment case law in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). However, we have had instead three Court of Appeal cases.

The first two make important statements on historically difficult

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll