header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 8 April 2022

08 April 2022 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
77721
Making history: Ian Smith performs a perfect loop-the-loop & serves up three significant Court of Appeal decisions

In brief

  • ‘Worker’ definition—no need for an irreducible minimum of obligation.
  • Detriment on union grounds does not extend to taking industrial action.
  • Directors/CEOs and employment status—the EU law angle.

Apart from the usual spate of annual changes in the run-up to the beginning of April (the increase of the various employment protection limits, the up-rating of the national minimum wage and relevant social security benefit, a review of the Vento scales for injury to feelings awards by the employment tribunal (ET) presidents and, this year, two replacement immigration law codes of practice for employers on the operation of the civil penalty scheme for employing illegal workers and how to avoid unlawful discrimination when using the system) this has been a relatively quiet month for employment case law in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). However, we have had instead three Court of Appeal cases.

The first two make important statements on historically difficult

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll