header-logo header-logo

13 May 2022 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7978 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 13 May 2022

81325
Relationships matter, says Ian Smith. And nowhere more so than in modern employment law which grapples with some of the more painful aspects of working life
  • The relationship between mutual agreement and taking a redundancy offer.
  • The relationship between the last straw doctrine and use of an internal grievance procedure.
  • The relationship between the duty to make reasonable adjustments and unfair dismissal.
  • The relationship between subjective belief and reasonableness in harassment law.

There is a theme to the four cases considered this month, which is relationships. For once (at the moment) this is not about various fumblings (with persons or tractors) after extended drinks in Parliamentary bars, but within particular areas of modern employment law, namely mutual agreement/ redundancy offers, the last straw doctrine/use of grievance procedures, the duty to make reasonable adjustments/unfair dismissal and subjective belief/reasonableness in harassment cases.

Mutual agreement & redundancy

The question whether an employment has been terminated by agreement (hence no dismissal and no action for unfair dismissal) has raised several important issues

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll