header-logo header-logo

12 September 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7855 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 September 2019

Ian Smith highlights the importance of keeping your eye on the employment law ball & keeping an eye out for unicorns

  • Statutory illegality and immigration status.
  • Holiday pay for a part-year worker and the limits on a works council’s input.

Two Court of Appeal decisions are considered here, on the important mainstream issues of the effect of the doctrine of illegality in a case concerning immigration status, and how the detailed rules on the entitlement to statutory holidays with pay apply to a part-year worker. By complete contrast, the two Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decisions then considered concern areas thought generally to have gone to sleep legally after initially causing considerable speculation as to their potential importance, namely transnational works councils and employee shareholder agreements. You really cannot take your eye off the ball in this subject!

Immigration status

The result in Okedina v Chikale [2019] EWCA Civ 1393, [2019] All ER (D) 18 (Aug) is of obvious importance wherever the facts show that a vulnerable individual was brought

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll