header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law briefing: 27 April 2007

DTI gets egg on its face, The Gibbons review, What should replace abandoned statutory procedures?

On a Thursday towards the end of March, your humble author was speaking at an employment law conference in London, giving the session on the statutory dismissal and grievance procedures, castigating them thoroughly, but giving the prediction that they would not be abandoned because of the amount of egg-on-face for the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), which had been so keen to impose them. At that exact moment, the DTI announced that the procedures were to be repealed completely.

Given this unerring accuracy and sense of timing on my part, giving me my new official position as Jonah to the world of employment law, I invite readers to write in to me with employment laws that they would love to see go so that I can arrange to speak on them, thus triggering this uncanny reaction from the DTI. Actually, as a list of such laws is likely to be unmanageable, please do not do

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll