header-logo header-logo

13 September 2007
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunal cases rise by 15%

News

The number of cases brought to employment tribunals in Britain in 2006–07 rose by 15%, from 115,039 in 2005–06 to 132,577, new figures from the Tribunals Service reveal.

Those disposed of last year also rose, by 19%, from 86,083 to 102,597. Unfair dismissal remains the most popular ground of claim: there were 44,491 of these compared to 41,832 the previous year.
Race discrimination cases were one of the few categories which saw a drop, falling from 4,103 in 2005–06 to 3,780 in 2006–07, while equal pay claims shot up to 44,013 compared to 17,268 the year before. Sex discrimination cases, meanwhile, almost doubled —rising from 14,250 to 28,153 year on year. Many of these, the research reveals, were brought in conjunction with equal pay claims.

Jeanne Spinks, chief operating officer of the Tribunals Service which administers employment tribunals, says: “The significant reason for the increase in employment tribunal cases in 2006–07 is a 155% increase in equal pay claims. We have set up two dedicated teams to process equal pay cases from NHS staff and have been working closely with our judiciary to ensure that all equal pay claims are progressed as efficiently as possible.”
She adds: “Despite an overall increase in cases this year, we’ve also managed to reduce the waiting times for single cases appearing before employment tribunals.”

Lyndon Willshire, sales manager at legal expenses insurer DAS UK, says the new figures dash suggestions that employee relations are becoming less combative and predicts a further rise in claims.

“The government’s attempts to reduce the number of claims going to tribunal have clearly only had a temporary effect. The three stage mandatory grievance procedure has not created a forum for mediation, rather a mechanism for concluding matters more efficiently. More legislation is on the way, and the effects of recent laws on age, belief and sexual orientation have yet to bite,” he adds.

Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll