header-logo header-logo

Employment tribunal cases rise by 15%

13 September 2007
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

News

The number of cases brought to employment tribunals in Britain in 2006–07 rose by 15%, from 115,039 in 2005–06 to 132,577, new figures from the Tribunals Service reveal.

Those disposed of last year also rose, by 19%, from 86,083 to 102,597. Unfair dismissal remains the most popular ground of claim: there were 44,491 of these compared to 41,832 the previous year.
Race discrimination cases were one of the few categories which saw a drop, falling from 4,103 in 2005–06 to 3,780 in 2006–07, while equal pay claims shot up to 44,013 compared to 17,268 the year before. Sex discrimination cases, meanwhile, almost doubled —rising from 14,250 to 28,153 year on year. Many of these, the research reveals, were brought in conjunction with equal pay claims.

Jeanne Spinks, chief operating officer of the Tribunals Service which administers employment tribunals, says: “The significant reason for the increase in employment tribunal cases in 2006–07 is a 155% increase in equal pay claims. We have set up two dedicated teams to process equal pay cases from NHS staff and have been working closely with our judiciary to ensure that all equal pay claims are progressed as efficiently as possible.”
She adds: “Despite an overall increase in cases this year, we’ve also managed to reduce the waiting times for single cases appearing before employment tribunals.”

Lyndon Willshire, sales manager at legal expenses insurer DAS UK, says the new figures dash suggestions that employee relations are becoming less combative and predicts a further rise in claims.

“The government’s attempts to reduce the number of claims going to tribunal have clearly only had a temporary effect. The three stage mandatory grievance procedure has not created a forum for mediation, rather a mechanism for concluding matters more efficiently. More legislation is on the way, and the effects of recent laws on age, belief and sexual orientation have yet to bite,” he adds.

Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll