header-logo header-logo

Employment tribunals: room for improvement?

10 October 2019 / Shantha David
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail
Claims in the employment tribunals have increased, but is justice being delivered? Shantha David reports

When employment tribunal (ET) fees were declared unlawful by the UK Supreme Court, Lord Justice Reed in his seminal judgment in R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, [2017] 4 All ER 903 established that ‘the constitutional right of access to the courts is inherent in the rule of law’ [66].

He emphasised that the ‘right of access to the courts has long been recognised’ and cited Magna Carta as ‘a guarantee of access to courts which administer justice promptly and fairly’ [74].

So what has happened to ET claims in the two years since this momentous decision?

The rise & fall in ET claims

We know that following a peak in 2009–10, year on year, fewer claims were being lodged in ETs. When fees were introduced in July 2013, there was a dramatic overall drop of about 70% of single claims.

The latest government statistics published

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll