header-logo header-logo

Employment tribunals: room for improvement?

10 October 2019 / Shantha David
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail
Claims in the employment tribunals have increased, but is justice being delivered? Shantha David reports

When employment tribunal (ET) fees were declared unlawful by the UK Supreme Court, Lord Justice Reed in his seminal judgment in R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, [2017] 4 All ER 903 established that ‘the constitutional right of access to the courts is inherent in the rule of law’ [66].

He emphasised that the ‘right of access to the courts has long been recognised’ and cited Magna Carta as ‘a guarantee of access to courts which administer justice promptly and fairly’ [74].

So what has happened to ET claims in the two years since this momentous decision?

The rise & fall in ET claims

We know that following a peak in 2009–10, year on year, fewer claims were being lodged in ETs. When fees were introduced in July 2013, there was a dramatic overall drop of about 70% of single claims.

The latest government statistics published

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll