header-logo header-logo

25 November 2011 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Opinion , Expert Witness , Costs
printer mail-detail

The end of expert frolics

Mark Solon appraises Lord Justice Jackson’s views on focusing expert evidence & controlling costs

Lord Justice Jackson delivered his fourth lecture on the implementation of his Civil Litigation Costs Review to 300 experts at the annual Bond Solon expert witness conference earlier this month. He spoke without notes or microphone and looked at two specific aspects of expert evidence: focusing expert evidence and managing the costs of expert evidence. The experts liked what he said on the first but not so much on the second. In essence, reports should be small but perfectly formed and cost less.

Focusing expert evidence

Jackson said courts should make greater use of their existing powers to control expert evidence, in particular by identifying the issues which experts should address at an early stage. “Many expert witnesses have expressed strong support for the above proposal. They would welcome directions given by the court at a case management conference identifying the issues upon which their expert

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll