header-logo header-logo

25 November 2011 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Opinion , Expert Witness , Costs
printer mail-detail

The end of expert frolics

Mark Solon appraises Lord Justice Jackson’s views on focusing expert evidence & controlling costs

Lord Justice Jackson delivered his fourth lecture on the implementation of his Civil Litigation Costs Review to 300 experts at the annual Bond Solon expert witness conference earlier this month. He spoke without notes or microphone and looked at two specific aspects of expert evidence: focusing expert evidence and managing the costs of expert evidence. The experts liked what he said on the first but not so much on the second. In essence, reports should be small but perfectly formed and cost less.

Focusing expert evidence

Jackson said courts should make greater use of their existing powers to control expert evidence, in particular by identifying the issues which experts should address at an early stage. “Many expert witnesses have expressed strong support for the above proposal. They would welcome directions given by the court at a case management conference identifying the issues upon which their expert

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll