header-logo header-logo

31 July 2014 / Graham Lyons
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Opinion , Family
printer mail-detail

End of the line for mediation?

speakerscorner_lyons

Family mediation services are in decline & in need of urgent reform, says Graham Lyons

When I was in full-time practice at the Bar, my head of chambers refused to pay any membership fees to the Bar Council saying they did nothing that would help or change his legal practice. Many members of my present family mediation profession feel that the current family mediation organisations—including the ADR Group, the College of Mediators, the Family Mediators Association (FMA), National Family Mediation (NFM) and Resolution—and the umbrella Family Mediation Council (FMC) also do little to merit financial support. This is because much of the day-to-day work by most of those organisations focuses on providing expensive courses run mainly by a few family professional practice consultants (PPCs) who do little current family mediation work.

Pay gap

Since the late 1990s, top quality family mediators, ie those trained under the demanding Legal Services Commission (LSC) requirements, continue to be paid an amount negotiated in that decade which has barely changed. They and privately paid mediators

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll