header-logo header-logo

End of the line for mediation?

31 July 2014 / Graham Lyons
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Opinion , Family
printer mail-detail
speakerscorner_lyons

Family mediation services are in decline & in need of urgent reform, says Graham Lyons

When I was in full-time practice at the Bar, my head of chambers refused to pay any membership fees to the Bar Council saying they did nothing that would help or change his legal practice. Many members of my present family mediation profession feel that the current family mediation organisations—including the ADR Group, the College of Mediators, the Family Mediators Association (FMA), National Family Mediation (NFM) and Resolution—and the umbrella Family Mediation Council (FMC) also do little to merit financial support. This is because much of the day-to-day work by most of those organisations focuses on providing expensive courses run mainly by a few family professional practice consultants (PPCs) who do little current family mediation work.

Pay gap

Since the late 1990s, top quality family mediators, ie those trained under the demanding Legal Services Commission (LSC) requirements, continue to be paid an amount negotiated in that decade which has barely changed. They and privately paid mediators

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll