header-logo header-logo

31 July 2014 / Graham Lyons
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Opinion , Family
printer mail-detail

End of the line for mediation?

speakerscorner_lyons

Family mediation services are in decline & in need of urgent reform, says Graham Lyons

When I was in full-time practice at the Bar, my head of chambers refused to pay any membership fees to the Bar Council saying they did nothing that would help or change his legal practice. Many members of my present family mediation profession feel that the current family mediation organisations—including the ADR Group, the College of Mediators, the Family Mediators Association (FMA), National Family Mediation (NFM) and Resolution—and the umbrella Family Mediation Council (FMC) also do little to merit financial support. This is because much of the day-to-day work by most of those organisations focuses on providing expensive courses run mainly by a few family professional practice consultants (PPCs) who do little current family mediation work.

Pay gap

Since the late 1990s, top quality family mediators, ie those trained under the demanding Legal Services Commission (LSC) requirements, continue to be paid an amount negotiated in that decade which has barely changed. They and privately paid mediators

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll