header-logo header-logo

12 February 2025
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Legal News , Health , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-detail

End of Life Bill drops High Court approval

An expert panel rather than a High Court judge would provide safeguards under the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which is now at the committee stage.

Previously, the Bill specified that a High Court judge would sign off applications once doctors’ consent was obtained.

However, Kim Leadbeater MP, sponsor of the Bill, said this week she will propose an amendment to create a ‘voluntary assisted dying commission’, chaired by a High Court judge or a former senior judge. The commission ‘would then authorise expert panels to look at every application for an assisted death.

‘Those panels would have a legal chair, but also include a psychiatrist and a social worker, who will bring their own expertise in assessing mental capacity and identifying any risk of coercion’.

The Law Society has stressed the need for ‘robust, accessible and independent safeguards’ including proper resourcing for the High Court to deal with the extra workload and the provision of non-means-tested legal aid to ensure adequate legal advice and representation.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll