header-logo header-logo

Learning from the last debate

13 December 2024 / John Keown
Issue: 8098 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Health
printer mail-detail
201006
Will the latest arguments in favour of the Leadbeater Bill be as flawed as those that came before? Professor John Keown considers what lessons can be learnt from history

In his foreword to my book Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy (2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2018), Lord Judge described euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide as ‘the great moral and legal issue of our time’. Over the past 20 years several attempts have been made to legalise physician-assisted suicide in England and Wales. Bills have been modelled on the Death with Dignity Act in the US state of Oregon, which allows physician-assisted suicide for competent patients with a ‘terminal illness’. More recent Bills, like the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill introduced by Kim Leadbeater MP, which passed its second reading last month, have added the requirement of a High Court declaration that the criteria have been satisfied.

A call for clarity

This article will, for two reasons, refer to ‘physician-assisted suicide’ not ‘assisted dying’. First, there is no crime of ‘assisting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll