header-logo header-logo

Learning from the last debate

13 December 2024 / John Keown
Issue: 8098 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Health
printer mail-detail
201006
Will the latest arguments in favour of the Leadbeater Bill be as flawed as those that came before? Professor John Keown considers what lessons can be learnt from history

In his foreword to my book Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy (2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2018), Lord Judge described euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide as ‘the great moral and legal issue of our time’. Over the past 20 years several attempts have been made to legalise physician-assisted suicide in England and Wales. Bills have been modelled on the Death with Dignity Act in the US state of Oregon, which allows physician-assisted suicide for competent patients with a ‘terminal illness’. More recent Bills, like the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill introduced by Kim Leadbeater MP, which passed its second reading last month, have added the requirement of a High Court declaration that the criteria have been satisfied.

A call for clarity

This article will, for two reasons, refer to ‘physician-assisted suicide’ not ‘assisted dying’. First, there is no crime of ‘assisting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll