header-logo header-logo

30 May 2013 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7562 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Endings & beginnings

istock_000008972099large

Roger Smith casts an eye over the comings & goings in the legal world

Lord McNally, the legal aid minister, was in unusually shaky form when presenting the government’s proposals for price competitive tendering at a Westminster Legal Policy Forum meeting at the end of April. Presenting his prepared text without energy, he departed at speed once it was over.

The minister’s message was as dispiriting as his delivery. It amounted to saying that legal aid practitioners need to diversify into more rewarding work: “It cannot be right that we have seen firms subsisting solely on public money. Where a business model relies solely on one source of revenue, of course it exposes itself to a level of risk when times start to change.” This is somewhat at variance with policy over the last 20 years which has been to encourage specialist providers and to discard others who were often derided as “dabblers”. Lord McNally’s message was somewhat bleaker than when he announced the assumption of his new legal aid responsibilities to the Legal Aid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll