header-logo header-logo

30 May 2013 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7562 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Endings & beginnings

istock_000008972099large

Roger Smith casts an eye over the comings & goings in the legal world

Lord McNally, the legal aid minister, was in unusually shaky form when presenting the government’s proposals for price competitive tendering at a Westminster Legal Policy Forum meeting at the end of April. Presenting his prepared text without energy, he departed at speed once it was over.

The minister’s message was as dispiriting as his delivery. It amounted to saying that legal aid practitioners need to diversify into more rewarding work: “It cannot be right that we have seen firms subsisting solely on public money. Where a business model relies solely on one source of revenue, of course it exposes itself to a level of risk when times start to change.” This is somewhat at variance with policy over the last 20 years which has been to encourage specialist providers and to discard others who were often derided as “dabblers”. Lord McNally’s message was somewhat bleaker than when he announced the assumption of his new legal aid responsibilities to the Legal Aid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll