header-logo header-logo

07 May 2009 / David Burrows
Issue: 7368 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Enforcement matters

Part 3: Do child support committal applications breach human rights? David Burrows reports

* * * * * *

The Child Support Agency (CSA), on behalf of the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission, is undertaking a “wave” (its word) of enforcement applications, and yet the committal application procedure under Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991), s 39A is probably in breach of Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Enforcement of payment of child support arrears derives from the liability order (CSA 1991 s 33: see NLJ, 6 March 2009, p 334 and NLJ, 20 March 2009, p 415). CSA 1991, s 39A(2)(a) enables magistrates, on application by the commission, to issue a warrant “committing [a] liable person to prison”. Thus the Commission can apply for imprisonment of a parent who is subject to a liability order.

CSA 1991, s 40(3) provides for disposal by the magistrates: “If, but only if, the court is of the opinion that there has been wilful refusal or culpable neglect on the part

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll