header-logo header-logo

09 August 2020
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Enough defence solicitors for extended hours?

The Law Society has hit out at HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) plans to pilot extended hours in up to seven courts

HMCTS has so far named Liverpool, Hull, Stafford and Snaresbrook Crown Courts as test courts for the COVID-19 operating hours pilot.

However, Simon Davis, Law Society president (pictured) warned criminal defence solicitors ‘can’t be magicked up to cover extended hours’.

He said the plans would adversely affect overstretched and underfunded criminal defence firms and the capacity to cover the additional hours might not even exist.

As of 2 July, according to a justice minister answering written questions, there were 1,146 firms (1,694 offices) holding a criminal legal aid contract―125 fewer criminal legal aid firms than in 2019 and far fewer than the 1,861 firms that existed in 2010.

‘We have repeatedly made clear to the Ministry of Justice that extended hours are not the right approach to tackling the backlogs in the courts because of the significant impact they would have on court users, legal practitioners and how our justice system functions,’ Davis said.

‘There would be financial and administrative implications for solicitors and those with caring responsibilities are likely to be hit hardest. Ever fewer criminal defence lawyers are being asked to do ever more work, and the profession is close to breaking point.

‘Despite our opposition, a pilot is going ahead to test out a model of extended hours. Court listing is a judicial function, so if a court chooses to list hearings in this way, there is little the profession can do about it.

‘If extended court hours are to be imposed on solicitors, the additional costs they face must be covered so they can continue to do their job properly, uphold the rule of law and allow people access to justice.’

Davis said: ‘Before looking at extended hours the Ministry of Justice and HMCTS must ensure that it is making maximum use of normal court hours and the existing court estate, quickly take up further building space and avoid any restrictions on judges sitting while there are court rooms (real, virtual or Nightingale) available.’

Issue: 7899 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll