header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007 / Dominic Thomas
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Environmental impact

Dominic Thomas explains why the demand for environmental insurance is on the increase

On 30 April 2007, the government is committed to implementing Directive 2004/35/EC on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. The Directive is based upon the ‘polluter pays’ principle, whereby polluters bear the cost of remediating the damage they cause to the environment, or the cost of measures to prevent imminent threat of damage. Crucially, the proposed Directive does not cover economic losses resulting from the damage, such as personal injury or property damage.

Controversial consultation

The Directive has been controversial from the outset. Its original wording obliged the European Commission (the Commission) to submit proposals for a harmonised compulsory financial guarantee for water and soil damage. However, concerns over cost implications meant that the requirement was dropped, but the issue is to be revisited in 2010 and is likely to be introduced eventually.

Even without compulsory guarantees, the consultation process for the Directive proved divisive. The green lobby, for instance, was critical that the proposed Directive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Private client department announces partner hire

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Firm appoints first joint heads of Wales office

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Global dispute resolution team promotes two partners in Guernsey and Cayman Islands

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll