header-logo header-logo

Environmental impact

18 January 2007 / Dominic Thomas
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Dominic Thomas explains why the demand for environmental insurance is on the increase

On 30 April 2007, the government is committed to implementing Directive 2004/35/EC on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. The Directive is based upon the ‘polluter pays’ principle, whereby polluters bear the cost of remediating the damage they cause to the environment, or the cost of measures to prevent imminent threat of damage. Crucially, the proposed Directive does not cover economic losses resulting from the damage, such as personal injury or property damage.

Controversial consultation

The Directive has been controversial from the outset. Its original wording obliged the European Commission (the Commission) to submit proposals for a harmonised compulsory financial guarantee for water and soil damage. However, concerns over cost implications meant that the requirement was dropped, but the issue is to be revisited in 2010 and is likely to be introduced eventually.

Even without compulsory guarantees, the consultation process for the Directive proved divisive. The green lobby, for instance, was critical that the proposed Directive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll