header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Equal but different

Siobhan Atkin doubts whether the Equality Bill will live up to expectations

Harriet Harman, the minister for equality, unveiled the government’s white paper on the Equality Bill in June announcing that it would be “a single statute to replace the complex web of legislation that has grown up over the years, it will make it easier for people to understand their rights and understand their obligations”. The consultation process is set to continue during the rest of this year.

Extending positive action
In the most publicised element of the Bill the government has said it will extend positive action so that employers can take into account, where appropriate, when selecting between two equally qualified candidates, under-representation of disadvantaged groups, for example women and people from ethnic minority communities.

At present, if an employer has two equally good candidates but decides to positively discriminate in favour of a candidate due to an under-representation in its workforce, then this would amount to unlawful positive discrimination. EU law also restricts the scope of positive discrimination and restricts what can

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll