header-logo header-logo

08 August 2023
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Equality Act win

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) unlawfully failed to provide blind and visually impaired people with accessible communications about their benefits, the High Court has held

The claimant, Dr Yusuf Ali Osman, can access correspondence in electronic format or in Braille but not in hard copy letters or in pdfs attached to emails. The judge held the DWP discriminated against blind and sight impaired people by failing to make reasonable adjustments, in breach of the Equality Act 2010.

Leigh Day solicitor Kate Egerton, who represented Dr Osman, said: ‘This ruling highlights how the DWP has repeatedly ignored complaints from blind and visually impaired individuals over its failure to send them accessible correspondence.’

Issue: 8037 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW strengthens global insurance practice and Greater China offering with London Partner hire

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon boosts Energy and Utilities practice with appointment of David McEwing

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson adds international construction arbitration partner in London push

NEWS
Law firm trainees are choosing US firms over their UK comparators, according to Chambers’ annual report on UK trainee satisfaction
A former senior judge has warned peers against scrapping juries for fraud and financial crimes, ahead of the Courts and Tribunals Bill’s second reading in the House of Lords this week
Civil practitioners face changes spanning debt recovery, workplace harassment and possession claims, alongside guidance on insolvency challenges and children proceedings

Finding matrimonial wealth is as challenging as dividing it, as family disputes draw practitioners into asset tracing, offshore structures and insolvency

Agreement between opponents offers no guarantee that a court will approve a retrospective increase to a costs budget
back-to-top-scroll