header-logo header-logo

Equality protections

24 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Government proposes to scrap equality provisions

Lawyers have hit out at government proposals to scrap two Equality Act 2010 protections for workers suffering discrimination or harassment.

The government published amendments to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill last week, to be considered in the report stage of the Bill. These would repeal ss 40 and 138 of the Act.

Under s 40, an employer can be held responsible for failing to stop harassment of staff by third parties, where they have been told about it, it has happened on at least two occasions, and the employer has failed to take reasonably practicable steps to prevent it.

Section 138 allows potential discrimination claimants to use a questionnaire to obtain information from their employer.

Angharad Harris, chairman of the Law Society employment law committee, says: “The third-party harassment provision encourages best practice among employers and this in turn helps to reduce potential incidents of harassment at work.

“The questionnaire procedure can also help employers because it encourages an employee to ask all of their questions at once, rather than through a series of informal questions which make it harder for an employer than if they had been raised all at once.”.”

Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll