header-logo header-logo

11 January 2013
Issue: 7543 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Equity—Beneficial interest—Land charge

Hughmans Solicitors v Central Stream Services Ltd (in liquidation) and others [2012] EWCA Civ 1720, [2012] All ER (D) 260 (Dec)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward, Hughes LJJ and David Richards J, 20 December 2012

A Tomlin Order directing the sale of a property and the payment of a fixed sum to a company may create a proprietary interest in the property in favour of that company.

Mark Warwick (instructed by Hughmans Solicitors) for the solicitors. Gary Cowen (instructed by Moon Beever) for the defendants.

The appellant was a firm of solicitors. It acted for D, who was the registered proprietor of a property. Proceedings were brought against D by the first respondent company. Those proceedings were compromised and a Tomlin Order was made. Under the Tomlin Order, the property was to be sold by D, and £100,000 of the proceeds were to be paid to the company. Following a dispute about unpaid fees, the solicitors brought their own proceedings against D. They obtained a charging order over the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll