header-logo header-logo

11 January 2013
Issue: 7543 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Equity—Beneficial interest—Land charge

Hughmans Solicitors v Central Stream Services Ltd (in liquidation) and others [2012] EWCA Civ 1720, [2012] All ER (D) 260 (Dec)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward, Hughes LJJ and David Richards J, 20 December 2012

A Tomlin Order directing the sale of a property and the payment of a fixed sum to a company may create a proprietary interest in the property in favour of that company.

Mark Warwick (instructed by Hughmans Solicitors) for the solicitors. Gary Cowen (instructed by Moon Beever) for the defendants.

The appellant was a firm of solicitors. It acted for D, who was the registered proprietor of a property. Proceedings were brought against D by the first respondent company. Those proceedings were compromised and a Tomlin Order was made. Under the Tomlin Order, the property was to be sold by D, and £100,000 of the proceeds were to be paid to the company. Following a dispute about unpaid fees, the solicitors brought their own proceedings against D. They obtained a charging order over the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll