header-logo header-logo

Estate planning: Liability matters

24 September 2020 / Jennifer Haywood
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
28046
Discharging estate liability can be a complex and challenging task. In the light of a recent decision, Jennifer Haywood outlines a court’s approach to ascertaining liabilities

In brief

  • Section 27 of the Trustee Act 1925 exempts personal representatives from liability for claims of which they do not have notice within two months of a suitable advertisement.
  • However, a personal representative may be regarded as being on notice of a class of claims, even if no one comes forward.
  • Re the Estate of Michael Studdert [2020] EWHC 1869 (Ch): a recent example of a personal representative being on notice, where there is reason to believe that the deceased has committed sexual assaults.

Being a personal representative can seem an invidious task. Claims against a deceased person endure against his estate (save for defamation), and a personal representative is obliged to ascertain the estate’s liabilities and arrangement for their payment in priority to any distribution to the beneficiaries. If a personal representative fails to discharge any estate liability, he may be personally liable.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

Ben Daniels, newly elected as the next senior partner of DAC Beachcroft, reflects on his leadership inspiration and considers an impish alternative career

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Family team bolstered by latest partner hire

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Firms strengthens national restructuring and insolvency practice with leadership appointments

NEWS
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
back-to-top-scroll