header-logo header-logo

24 September 2020 / Jennifer Haywood
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Estate planning: Liability matters

28046
Discharging estate liability can be a complex and challenging task. In the light of a recent decision, Jennifer Haywood outlines a court’s approach to ascertaining liabilities

In brief

  • Section 27 of the Trustee Act 1925 exempts personal representatives from liability for claims of which they do not have notice within two months of a suitable advertisement.
  • However, a personal representative may be regarded as being on notice of a class of claims, even if no one comes forward.
  • Re the Estate of Michael Studdert [2020] EWHC 1869 (Ch): a recent example of a personal representative being on notice, where there is reason to believe that the deceased has committed sexual assaults.

Being a personal representative can seem an invidious task. Claims against a deceased person endure against his estate (save for defamation), and a personal representative is obliged to ascertain the estate’s liabilities and arrangement for their payment in priority to any distribution to the beneficiaries. If a personal representative fails to discharge any estate liability, he may be personally liable.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll