header-logo header-logo

27 October 2016
Issue: 7720 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU

Morningstar, Inc v European Commission T-76/14, [2016] All ER (D) 122 (Oct)

The General Court of the European Union dismissed the action by Morning Star, Inc for annulment of Commission decision C(2012) final relating to proceedings under Art 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Art 54 of the European Economic Area Agreement. The General Court held that the European Commission had not made any manifest errors of commitment or breached any principles of EU law when it had accepted final commitments made by Thomson Reuters Corporation and companies under its indirect control, including Reuters Ltd (TR). Those commitments had been made following the Commission’s preliminary assessment that TR had allegedly abused its dominant position in the worldwide market for consolidated real-time datafeeds.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll