header-logo header-logo

02 December 2016
Issue: 7725 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU

Ullens de Schooten v Etat belge C-268/15, [2016] All ER (D) 145 (Nov)

The Court of Justice of the European Union gave a preliminary ruling, deciding that EU law had to be interpreted as meaning that the system of non-contractual liability of a member state for damage caused by a breach of that law did not apply in the case of damage allegedly caused to an individual as a result of an alleged breach of a fundamental freedom laid down in Arts 49, 56 or 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by national legislation that was applicable without distinction to the state’s own nationals and those of other member states, where, in a situation which was confined in all respects within a single member state, there was no link between the subject or circumstances of the dispute in the main proceedings and those articles.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll