header-logo header-logo

11 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU—Agriculture

Panellinios Sindesmos Viomikhanion Metapiisis Kapnou v Ipourgos Ikonomias kai Ikonomikon and another C-373/11, [2013] All ER (D) 197 (Sep)

It was settled EU case law that Art 34(2) EC, which prohibited all discrimination under the common agricultural policy, was merely a specific expression of the general principle of equal treatment, which required that comparable situations should not be treated differently and different situations not treated alike unless such treatment was objectively justified. Further, member states might adopt provisions in a situation governed by EU law where that law expressly conferred on them decision-making powers. The prohibition on discrimination was not concerned with any disparities in treatment which might result, between the member states, from divergences existing between the legislation of the various member states, so long as that legislation affected equally all persons subject to it. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll