header-logo header-logo

05 July 2007
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail

EU labour law reform proposals take a knock

European Commission plans to extend EU labour laws have been rejected by a House of Lords report.

The report, Modernising European Union Labour Law: Has the UK Anything to Gain?, says the relatively light regulation of the UK labour market has boosted flexible employment arrangements, which have benefited the UK economy.

The report comes in response to the Commission’s green paper on EU labour law and follows negotiations at the recent EU summit, which could mean big changes to UK employment practices.
Alan Tyrrell, employment chairman at the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), says: “Their report demonstrates that there is no desire in the UK for the imposition of further EU-inspired labour law.

“Unfortunately, this comes hard on the heels of the UK government signing away its right to prevent this happening in the future at the recent EU summit. This could have grave consequences for small businesses in the UK.”
Tyrrell points out that leading EU legal academics, such as Jacques Ziller, a professor at the European University Institute in Florence, have argued that the UK’s opt-out from the Charter of Fundamental Rights is not legally binding.

A recent survey, he adds, shows that 35% of FSB members have decided not to employ anyone, considering that employees are “too great a business risk”. In 2006 the FSB legal helpline received 77,000 calls on employment law.

Issue: 7280 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll