header-logo header-logo

05 July 2007
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail

EU labour law reform proposals take a knock

European Commission plans to extend EU labour laws have been rejected by a House of Lords report.

The report, Modernising European Union Labour Law: Has the UK Anything to Gain?, says the relatively light regulation of the UK labour market has boosted flexible employment arrangements, which have benefited the UK economy.

The report comes in response to the Commission’s green paper on EU labour law and follows negotiations at the recent EU summit, which could mean big changes to UK employment practices.
Alan Tyrrell, employment chairman at the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), says: “Their report demonstrates that there is no desire in the UK for the imposition of further EU-inspired labour law.

“Unfortunately, this comes hard on the heels of the UK government signing away its right to prevent this happening in the future at the recent EU summit. This could have grave consequences for small businesses in the UK.”
Tyrrell points out that leading EU legal academics, such as Jacques Ziller, a professor at the European University Institute in Florence, have argued that the UK’s opt-out from the Charter of Fundamental Rights is not legally binding.

A recent survey, he adds, shows that 35% of FSB members have decided not to employ anyone, considering that employees are “too great a business risk”. In 2006 the FSB legal helpline received 77,000 calls on employment law.

Issue: 7280 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll