header-logo header-logo

EU lawyers court expansion

07 June 2018
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

English-speaking courts to be launched across Europe

The number of international English-speaking courts in the main European jurisdictions is likely to rise post-Brexit, with projects currently underway in Brussels, Paris, Frankfurt and Amsterdam.

The Netherlands Commercial Court, a specialist international court using the English language, is due to open this year. The German government announced plans last year to launch an English-speaking court in Frankfurt.

In February, the French government opened an English-speaking division of the Paris Court of Appeal, with the French justice minister Nicole Belloubet stating at the time that the London courts could be ‘replaced by other European jurisdictions’. Unlike its Belgian, German and Dutch counterparts, the Paris court can make decisions based on English law.

The Belgian government aims to open the Brussels International Business Court (BIBC) by 2020. It will hear cross-border commercial disputes and will be comprised of professional judges and lay judges, who will be selected by national and international legal experts and called on an ad hoc basis.

‘Following the national and international economic and political developments of the year 2017—including Brexit—the Belgian government sensed the need to create a specialised court capable of hearing cross-border commercial disputes,’ said Hakim Boularbah, partner, and Sarah Compagnion, associate, at Belgian firm Liedekerke Wolters Waelbroeck Kirkpatrick, in an interview with LexisNexis Legal Analysis last week.

‘The government observed that despite the role played by Brussels in the European and international scene as a host to many international and European institutions and companies, those wishing to appear before an English-speaking state court in Belgium, and not resort to arbitration, had no choice but to have their legal disputes decided abroad.’

There will be no appeal process, and disputes will be determined on the basis of Belgian private international law. Procedural rules will be based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration.

Issue: 7796 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll