header-logo header-logo

EU money laundering rules unclear

18 January 2007
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking
printer mail-detail

In brief

Solicitors are in danger of inadvertently committing criminal offences because new money laundering regulations are impossible to interpret in practice, the Law Society warns.

The society also claims that the government’s move to implement the Third Money Laundering Directive will increase the cost to clients of solicitor’s work in dealing with trusts. It is demanding that the government makes regulations with workable definitions of vital terms.

The Directive concerns when solicitors must verify the identity of beneficiaries in trusts. However, the society claims, it fails to provide workable definitions of vital points such as the test to determine when control of assets actually passes to the beneficiary of a trust.
Law Society president, Fiona Woolf, says that a number of the terms in the new EU Directive are unclear, and unless the government clarifies them, in making the regulations, solicitors will have to make extensive inquiries to avoid inadvertently committing a criminal offence. This will only serve to bump up the cost to clients.

She says: “It is unacceptable for the government to pass the responsibility of interpreting the incomprehensible language of this Directive to solicitors. The government must resolve these problems now.”

Issue: 7256 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll