header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking
printer mail-detail

EU money laundering rules unclear

In brief

Solicitors are in danger of inadvertently committing criminal offences because new money laundering regulations are impossible to interpret in practice, the Law Society warns.

The society also claims that the government’s move to implement the Third Money Laundering Directive will increase the cost to clients of solicitor’s work in dealing with trusts. It is demanding that the government makes regulations with workable definitions of vital terms.

The Directive concerns when solicitors must verify the identity of beneficiaries in trusts. However, the society claims, it fails to provide workable definitions of vital points such as the test to determine when control of assets actually passes to the beneficiary of a trust.
Law Society president, Fiona Woolf, says that a number of the terms in the new EU Directive are unclear, and unless the government clarifies them, in making the regulations, solicitors will have to make extensive inquiries to avoid inadvertently committing a criminal offence. This will only serve to bump up the cost to clients.

She says: “It is unacceptable for the government to pass the responsibility of interpreting the incomprehensible language of this Directive to solicitors. The government must resolve these problems now.”

Issue: 7256 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll