header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking
printer mail-detail

EU money laundering rules unclear

In brief

Solicitors are in danger of inadvertently committing criminal offences because new money laundering regulations are impossible to interpret in practice, the Law Society warns.

The society also claims that the government’s move to implement the Third Money Laundering Directive will increase the cost to clients of solicitor’s work in dealing with trusts. It is demanding that the government makes regulations with workable definitions of vital terms.

The Directive concerns when solicitors must verify the identity of beneficiaries in trusts. However, the society claims, it fails to provide workable definitions of vital points such as the test to determine when control of assets actually passes to the beneficiary of a trust.
Law Society president, Fiona Woolf, says that a number of the terms in the new EU Directive are unclear, and unless the government clarifies them, in making the regulations, solicitors will have to make extensive inquiries to avoid inadvertently committing a criminal offence. This will only serve to bump up the cost to clients.

She says: “It is unacceptable for the government to pass the responsibility of interpreting the incomprehensible language of this Directive to solicitors. The government must resolve these problems now.”

Issue: 7256 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll