header-logo header-logo

17 October 2013
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

EU priority

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights trumps domestic law

Mr Justice Langstaff has held that the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights requires provisions of the State Immunity Act 1978 to be disapplied where they bar employment law claims that are within the material scope of EU law.

In Benkharbouche v Sudan UKEAT/0020/13/GE, staff from the Sudanese and Libyan embassies had brought claims under the Working Time Directive, for discrimination and unfair dismissal. Their claims were dismissed due to state immunity. They argued this breached their right of access to a court or tribunal under Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Art 47 of the EU Charter.

Langstaff J held that, where a general and fundamental principle of EU law is concerned, the UK courts must disapply a contradictory domestic law, including primary legislation.

Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll