header-logo header-logo

24 February 2021
Issue: 7922 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

European Commission ponders next steps for UK-EU data flow

The European Commission has taken steps towards ensuring the flow of personal data between the UK and the rest of Europe can continue after the 30 June cut-off point.

The commission launched the process for two adequacy decisions for transfers of personal data to be adopted, one under the General Data Protection Regulation and the other for the Law Enforcement Directive. Next steps include gaining the approval of a committee of representatives of the EU member states.

Didier Reynders, commissioner for justice, said: ‘A flow of secure data between the EU and the UK is crucial to maintain close trade ties and cooperate effectively in the fight against crime.’

Currently, data flows between the UK and European Economic Area (EEA) courtesy of an interim regime established by the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which is due to expire on 30 June 2021.

David Greene, president of the Law Society, said adoption of the two decisions ‘would be of significant benefit to our members and their clients.

‘Without formal adequacy recognition, UK organisations will need to have in place alternative safeguards to ensure they may continue to receive personal data from the EU and EEA, such as standard contractual clauses or another transfer mechanism. Until the adequacy decisions are adopted, we continue to advise the profession to continue to prepare in the event that adequacy is not approved by the EU.’

A report published by the Centre for European Reform (CER) this week highlighted the need for the UK government to try to reduce the risk of restrictions on the cross-border flow of data.

The report, ‘Keeping up appearances: what now for UK services trade?’, also called on the government to create a stable policy environment, liberalise its immigration regime and seek continued preferential access to the EU market where possible. This would help make the UK an attractive location in which multinational services firms can invest and establish themselves. 

Issue: 7922 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll