header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

European employees too scared to blow whistle

One in five employees of European multinational companies say they won’t blow the whistle if they suspect a case of fraud, bribery or corruption in their organisation, according to a new study.

The survey, Fraud Risk Mitigation in 13 European Countries, shows that UK employees would be the most comfortable about dobbing in their companies (86%) while employees in France (39%) feel the least at ease about blowing the whistle in the workplace for fear of reprisals.

Ernst & Young interviewed 1,300 employees of multinational companies in eight western European and five central and eastern European countries—100 respondents in each country—asking how they thought anti-fraud measures were implemented within their employer organisations.  
Only 38% of respondents are aware of a whistle-blower hotline in their workplace, highlighting the lack of education and awareness in many companies. UK respondents showed the greatest awareness (72%) and Slovakian the least (27%).

John Smart, fraud investigation and dispute services partner at Ernst & Young, says: “The UK has developed a very strong reporting culture, based on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll