header-logo header-logo

European pie

02 November 2012 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Family
printer mail-detail
istock_000008775282medium_path_4

What has Europe done to protect the necessities of motherhood? Peter Thompson QC reports

In western democracies, motherhood is generally seen as a good thing, a praiseworthy status, something it would be dangerous to criticise or cast doubt on. In Europe, motherhood may not be bracketed with apple pie, as it is in the US, but there is at least wide recognition that the survival of the human race depends on it. Indeed cautious steps have been taken in the last 50 years to see that women are not disadvantaged in society and in the market place by the necessities of motherhood.

Sex Discrimination Act

The UK was an early leader. The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) provided, obliquely, that discrimination on the ground of pregnancy could amount to sex discrimination. However, the framework of SDA 1975 seemed to require the courts to compare a pregnant woman with a man with an incapacitating illness and to find discrimination against the pregnant woman only if the sick man would have been treated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll