header-logo header-logo

02 November 2012 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Family
printer mail-detail

European pie

istock_000008775282medium_path_4

What has Europe done to protect the necessities of motherhood? Peter Thompson QC reports

In western democracies, motherhood is generally seen as a good thing, a praiseworthy status, something it would be dangerous to criticise or cast doubt on. In Europe, motherhood may not be bracketed with apple pie, as it is in the US, but there is at least wide recognition that the survival of the human race depends on it. Indeed cautious steps have been taken in the last 50 years to see that women are not disadvantaged in society and in the market place by the necessities of motherhood.

Sex Discrimination Act

The UK was an early leader. The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) provided, obliquely, that discrimination on the ground of pregnancy could amount to sex discrimination. However, the framework of SDA 1975 seemed to require the courts to compare a pregnant woman with a man with an incapacitating illness and to find discrimination against the pregnant woman only if the sick man would have been treated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll