header-logo header-logo

European pie

02 November 2012 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Family
printer mail-detail
istock_000008775282medium_path_4

What has Europe done to protect the necessities of motherhood? Peter Thompson QC reports

In western democracies, motherhood is generally seen as a good thing, a praiseworthy status, something it would be dangerous to criticise or cast doubt on. In Europe, motherhood may not be bracketed with apple pie, as it is in the US, but there is at least wide recognition that the survival of the human race depends on it. Indeed cautious steps have been taken in the last 50 years to see that women are not disadvantaged in society and in the market place by the necessities of motherhood.

Sex Discrimination Act

The UK was an early leader. The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) provided, obliquely, that discrimination on the ground of pregnancy could amount to sex discrimination. However, the framework of SDA 1975 seemed to require the courts to compare a pregnant woman with a man with an incapacitating illness and to find discrimination against the pregnant woman only if the sick man would have been treated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll