header-logo header-logo

European pie

02 November 2012 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Family
printer mail-detail
istock_000008775282medium_path_4

What has Europe done to protect the necessities of motherhood? Peter Thompson QC reports

In western democracies, motherhood is generally seen as a good thing, a praiseworthy status, something it would be dangerous to criticise or cast doubt on. In Europe, motherhood may not be bracketed with apple pie, as it is in the US, but there is at least wide recognition that the survival of the human race depends on it. Indeed cautious steps have been taken in the last 50 years to see that women are not disadvantaged in society and in the market place by the necessities of motherhood.

Sex Discrimination Act

The UK was an early leader. The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) provided, obliquely, that discrimination on the ground of pregnancy could amount to sex discrimination. However, the framework of SDA 1975 seemed to require the courts to compare a pregnant woman with a man with an incapacitating illness and to find discrimination against the pregnant woman only if the sick man would have been treated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll