header-logo header-logo

08 August 2013
Issue: 7572 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

European Union

Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd and other companies v Asda Stores Ltd C-252/12, [2013] All ER (D) 355 (Jul)

It was well established that the condition of genuine use of a trade mark, within the meaning of Art 15(1) of Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009 (on the Community trade mark) might be satisfied where the trade mark was used only through another composite mark, or where it was used only in conjunction with another mark, and the combination of those two marks was, further, itself registered as a trade mark. In relation to Art 10(2)(a) of Directive 89/104, which provision corresponded, in essence, to the second sub-paragraph of Art 15(1)(a) of the Regulation, the court had further held that the proprietor of a registered trade mark was not precluded from relying, in order to establish use of the trade mark for the purposes of that provision, on the fact that it was used in a form which differed from the form in which it was registered, without the differences between the two altering the distinctive character of that trade

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll