header-logo header-logo

Ever-decreasing circles

18 October 2007 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Does anyone still care about legal aid?
wonders Roger Smith

It’s hard to make out what’s happening in legal aid. The recently published 2007 Pre-Budget Report and Comprehensive Spending Review states that legal aid will be cut by just under £200m by 2010-11. This appears to mean only that legal aid spending is to be flatlined at about £2bn a year. This will be bad enough, particularly as it’s boom time for prison builders. But what will happen to legal aid over the period of the spending review?

Legal aid spending reached probably its maximum level ever in 2002–3 when it amounted to £2.1bn. Since then it has hovered around the £2bn mark—where it will stay. Anyone who has heard secretary of state for justice Jack Straw speak about legal aid will recognise three things. First, he is not really interested. Second, he wants to reduce the budget. Indeed, at the recent Labour party conference in Bournemouth, he expressly queried why such spending should be higher than in France, Italy or Ireland—three countries with somewhat unremarkable legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll