header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Ever-decreasing circles

Does anyone still care about legal aid?
wonders Roger Smith

It’s hard to make out what’s happening in legal aid. The recently published 2007 Pre-Budget Report and Comprehensive Spending Review states that legal aid will be cut by just under £200m by 2010-11. This appears to mean only that legal aid spending is to be flatlined at about £2bn a year. This will be bad enough, particularly as it’s boom time for prison builders. But what will happen to legal aid over the period of the spending review?

Legal aid spending reached probably its maximum level ever in 2002–3 when it amounted to £2.1bn. Since then it has hovered around the £2bn mark—where it will stay. Anyone who has heard secretary of state for justice Jack Straw speak about legal aid will recognise three things. First, he is not really interested. Second, he wants to reduce the budget. Indeed, at the recent Labour party conference in Bournemouth, he expressly queried why such spending should be higher than in France, Italy or Ireland—three countries with somewhat unremarkable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll