header-logo header-logo

Every cloud...

28 April 2016 / Carla Brown
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_7696_brown

The Panama Papers scandal could have a positive impact for private client lawyers, says Carla Brown

While the recent revelations and widespread media coverage surrounding the Panama Papers and David Cameron’s mother’s inheritance tax (IHT) planning have been negative, it could have positive benefits for private client lawyers.

I say this because the “tax avoidance scandal” has helped raise awareness of IHT planning generally, with a good few of the national papers that have personal finance sections pointing out that IHT and, more broadly, estate planning are a very sensible thing to do. As a result, what was often seen as a subject worthy of only occasional coverage by the media has recently received a great deal of mainstream attention.

There’s a second benefit and that is, while our traditional and routine tax planning tools, such as the use of statutory reliefs and exemptions like business property relief, agricultural property relief, capital and small gift allowances, normal expenditure out of income, gifts on marriage, potentially exempt transfers (PETs) etc may not be as sexy as the image

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll