header-logo header-logo

Evidence

10 January 2014
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Secretary of State for Home Department) v Southwark Crown Court [2013] All ER (D) 197 (Dec)

Section 13(1)(b) of the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003 should be read: “(1) Where a request for assistance in obtaining evidence in a part of the UK is received by the territorial authority for that part, the authority may...—(b) direct that a search warrant or order be applied for under or by virtue of section 16 or 17 or, in relation to evidence in Scotland, 18.” 

It was settled law that it was the task of the court to make sense of the text of the statutory provision read in its appropriate context and within the limits of the judicial role. The courts were ever mindful that their constitutional role in that field was interpretative. They had to abstain from any course which might have the appearance of judicial legislation. A statute was expressed in language approved and enacted by the legislature. Accordingly, the courts exercised considerable caution before adding or omitting or substituting words. Before interpreting a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll