header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Evidence—Admissibility—Criminal proceedings

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Gohil v Gohil [2012] EWCA Civ 1550, [2012] All ER (D) 287 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Dyson MR, Lady Justice Hallett and Lord Justice McFarlane, 26 Nov 2012

Unless the requested country has consented to its wider use, s 9(2) of the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003 (CIA 2003) prohibits the use of evidence for any purpose other than that specified in the request without the consent of the requested authority, even where those documents have already been properly put into the public domain. That prohibition applies as much to the use of evidence in other criminal investigations and proceedings as it does to its use in civil proceedings of any description.

Stephen Cobb QC and Nicola Fox (instructed by Hodge Jones and Allen LLP) for the wife. James Turner QC and Elissa da Costa-Waldman (instructed by Duncan Lewis (Solicitors) Ltd) for the husband. Julian B Knowles QC and Esther Schutzer-Weissman (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the CPS. Jonathan Swift QC and Melanie Cumberland (instructed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll