header-logo header-logo

14 January 2010 / Philippa Charles , Daniel Hart
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The evolution of Rome

Cross-border litigation in the EU examined by Philippa Charles & Daniel Hart

The law which governs such contracts is a crucial issue. It can affect what the obligations of the parties are and the circumstances in which the contract may be terminated. It can even determine whether a claim can be made for breach, since limitation periods differ under the laws of different countries.

Governing law in contract claims—Rome I

For contracts concluded after 17 December 2009, the rules for determining the law applicable to contractual obligations will be found in a new Regulation No 593/2008 (known as Rome I). It replaces the Rome Convention of 1980.

Rome I generally mirrors the main principles of the Rome Convention. However, it does make some additions and alterations. The key changes are noted below.

Choice of law made by the parties

The key tenet of Rome I remains that a choice of law made by the parties will generally be upheld (A3(1)). However, other laws may nevertheless be applied in some circumstances. While

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll