header-logo header-logo

14 January 2010 / Philippa Charles , Daniel Hart
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The evolution of Rome

Cross-border litigation in the EU examined by Philippa Charles & Daniel Hart

The law which governs such contracts is a crucial issue. It can affect what the obligations of the parties are and the circumstances in which the contract may be terminated. It can even determine whether a claim can be made for breach, since limitation periods differ under the laws of different countries.

Governing law in contract claims—Rome I

For contracts concluded after 17 December 2009, the rules for determining the law applicable to contractual obligations will be found in a new Regulation No 593/2008 (known as Rome I). It replaces the Rome Convention of 1980.

Rome I generally mirrors the main principles of the Rome Convention. However, it does make some additions and alterations. The key changes are noted below.

Choice of law made by the parties

The key tenet of Rome I remains that a choice of law made by the parties will generally be upheld (A3(1)). However, other laws may nevertheless be applied in some circumstances. While

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll