header-logo header-logo

14 January 2010 / Philippa Charles , Daniel Hart
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The evolution of Rome

Cross-border litigation in the EU examined by Philippa Charles & Daniel Hart

The law which governs such contracts is a crucial issue. It can affect what the obligations of the parties are and the circumstances in which the contract may be terminated. It can even determine whether a claim can be made for breach, since limitation periods differ under the laws of different countries.

Governing law in contract claims—Rome I

For contracts concluded after 17 December 2009, the rules for determining the law applicable to contractual obligations will be found in a new Regulation No 593/2008 (known as Rome I). It replaces the Rome Convention of 1980.

Rome I generally mirrors the main principles of the Rome Convention. However, it does make some additions and alterations. The key changes are noted below.

Choice of law made by the parties

The key tenet of Rome I remains that a choice of law made by the parties will generally be upheld (A3(1)). However, other laws may nevertheless be applied in some circumstances. While

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll