header-logo header-logo

20 October 2017
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

The evolution of third party funding

nlj_7766_purewal

Litigation funding can help control costs & add value to the litigation process, says Sergei Purewal

  • The growth and establishment of litigation funding.
  • Paying for litigation costs and managing risk.

If in a particular erudite game of trivial pursuit, about a decade or so ago, you were asked whether litigation funding by a third party in the UK was a part of the mainstream consideration for litigation costs, your answer almost definitely would have been: ‘What is third party litigation funding?’

Litigation funding, and its emergence as a professional market, developed outside of the UK in a common law jurisdiction largely within the insolvency sector. In many civil law jurisdictions, an outright assignment of a claim to a third party has always to an extent been legally possible. Despite some corners of the legal profession believing otherwise, the days of applying the principles of maintenance and champerty have not gone away. There are still checks and balances in place when it comes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll