header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 January 2026 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8144 / Categories: Features , Education , Public , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

Exclusion zone

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
239517
Nicholas Dobson examines the case of a school ski trip, a confiscated mobile phone & a permanent exclusion
  • A pupil was permanently excluded from school after she entered a teacher’s hotel room during a school ski trip, retrieving a confiscated mobile phone.
  • The Court of Appeal dismissed her appeal, finding that the judge had correctly applied a heightened intensity of review, and that no material aspect of his reasoning was wrong.

In Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374, [1984] 3 All ER 935, Lord Diplock famously identified the three major types of power abuse as: illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety. These underpin judicial review challenges.

One such appeal featuring irrationality considerations concerned school exclusion. This was R (on the application of SAG by her litigation friend ERG) v The Governing Body of Winchmore School [2025] EWCA Civ 1335. Judgment was given on 21 October 2025 by Lord Justice Arnold, Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing and Lord Justice Edis, the last dissenting.

The appellant,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Read All
APIL sees off ‘substantial prejudice’ defence
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
NLJ this week: Civil practice with claws & caution
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll