header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 January 2026 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8144 / Categories: Features , Education , Public , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

Exclusion zone

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
239517
Nicholas Dobson examines the case of a school ski trip, a confiscated mobile phone & a permanent exclusion
  • A pupil was permanently excluded from school after she entered a teacher’s hotel room during a school ski trip, retrieving a confiscated mobile phone.
  • The Court of Appeal dismissed her appeal, finding that the judge had correctly applied a heightened intensity of review, and that no material aspect of his reasoning was wrong.

In Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374, [1984] 3 All ER 935, Lord Diplock famously identified the three major types of power abuse as: illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety. These underpin judicial review challenges.

One such appeal featuring irrationality considerations concerned school exclusion. This was R (on the application of SAG by her litigation friend ERG) v The Governing Body of Winchmore School [2025] EWCA Civ 1335. Judgment was given on 21 October 2025 by Lord Justice Arnold, Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing and Lord Justice Edis, the last dissenting.

The appellant,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Is inequality undermining trust?
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
NLJ this week: Freemasons ruling backs police transparency over privacy claims
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
NLJ this week: Right to grieve marks ‘major shift’ in employment law
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
NLJ this week: AI privilege battles expose risks
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
NLJ this week: Experts warned—AI use must be transparent
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll